COMPARISON
MT4 vs MT5 for automated trading
VERDICT
For a new automated system, MT5. MT4 is no longer developed, its backtester is weaker and more optimistic, and the only real argument for it is an existing library of EAs you already own.
| Criterion | MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 |
|---|---|---|
| EA language | MQL4 | MQL5 — not compatible, EAs must be rewritten |
| Backtester | Single-threaded, known to be optimistic | Multi-threaded, real-tick modelling available |
| Timeframes | 9 | 21 |
| Account model | Hedging only | Netting or hedging, broker-dependent |
| Development status | Effectively frozen; not licensed to new brokers | Actively developed |
| Instrument coverage | FX and CFDs | Adds exchange-traded instruments and depth of market |
The incompatibility is total
MQL4 and MQL5 are different enough that no conversion tool produces a working result for anything non-trivial. An .ex4 file will never appear in the MT5 Navigator, and this catches people who assume the platforms are versions of each other rather than separate products — see EA not in Navigator.
Practically this means the choice of platform is the choice of EA library. You are not picking a chart package, you are picking which programs can run.
The backtester difference matters more than the feature list
MT4's strategy tester is single-threaded and its modelling is well documented as producing optimistic results relative to reality. MT5 supports real-tick modelling and multi-threaded optimisation, which does not make a backtest trustworthy but removes one specific source of inflation.
Neither tester models spread widening, slippage or the broker minimum lot realistically without deliberate configuration, so the assumptions that inflate results apply to both.
The account model catches people migrating
MT4 is always hedging — multiple positions on the same symbol coexist independently. MT5 may be netting depending on the broker, in which case opposing orders offset into a single net position.
An EA written assuming hedging can behave unpredictably on a netting account, which is worth checking before running any unfamiliar system. See hedging.
Other comparisons
- Trading bot vs manual tradingAutomation wins on consistency, availability and record-keeping. Manual wins on adapting to …
- Expert Advisor vs copy tradingAn EA is more transparent and more durable — the rules are fixed and keep running. Copy trad…
- Grid trading vs trend followingTrend following, on risk grounds alone. Both lose in the wrong regime, but a trend system lo…
- Free vs paid trading botsPrice tells you almost nothing. What separates usable from unusable is whether the vendor pu…
Educational information only, not financial advice. Trading leveraged products carries substantial risk of loss. Last updated 2026-08-11.